Utilization of AHP-MAUT Method to Determine the Country of Exhibition Abroad in Batik Hatta Boutique

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Sep 30, 2021
DOI https://doi.org/10.25077/jitce.5.02.52-56.2021

Main Article Content

Saifur Rohman Cholil
Universitas Semarang
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2969-980X Tria Ardianita
Universitas Semarang

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of helping decide the destination country for overseas exhibitions at the Batik Hatta Boutique. By knowing all the data and information of a country, boutique owners can decide which country to visit in the batik exhibition. Because if you attend the cast in all countries, there will be overruns in costs. The methods used are AHP and MAUT. The AHP method is used as a weighting using a linguistic value scale. Weights are obtained from the pairwise comparison matrix between two elements of all elements that occur at the same hierarchical level. The MAUT method is used to determine the importance of each alternative for the ranking process. The results of this study indicate that Cambodia was chosen as the location to be visited for the batik exhibition. The results of the validation using the Spearman Rank correlation comparison obtained a value of 0.951 meaning that this method can be used as a decision making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cholil, S. R., & Ardianita, T. (2021, September 30). Utilization of AHP-MAUT Method to Determine the Country of Exhibition Abroad in Batik Hatta Boutique. JITCE (Journal of Information Technology and Computer Engineering), 5(02), 52-56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/jitce.5.02.52-56.2021
Issue
Vol 5 No 02 (2021): Journal of Information Technology and Computer Engineering
Section
Articles

1. License

Creative Commons License

 

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

2. Author(s)’ Warranties

The author(s) warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

JITCE adopts the spirit of open access and open science, which disseminates articles published as free as possible under the Creative Commons license. JITCE permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and JITCE on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:

  • Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • the right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
  • the right to reproduce the article for own purposes, 
  • the right to self-archive the article.
  • the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Information Technology and Computer Engineering).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors; upon submitting the article, the author is agreed on this form and warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors. JITCE will be freed on any disputes that will occur regarding this issue. 

7. Royalties

By submitting the articles, the authors agreed that no fees are payable from JITCE.

 

8. Miscellaneous

JITCE will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and JITCE or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. JITCE may adjust the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers. 

References

[1] A. Prasetyo and Singgih, “Karakteristik Motif Batik Kendal Interpretasi dari Wilayah dan Letak Geografis,” Imajin. J. Seni, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2016.
[2] I. K. Iskandar and Eny, “Batik Sebagai Identitas Kultural Indonesia Di Era Globalisasi,” pp. 2456–2472, 2017.
[3] Y. Yulmaini, A. Sanusi, and M. A. E. Yusendra, “The Implementation of AHP for Determining Dominant Criteria in Higher Education Competitiveness Development Strategy Based on Information Technology,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, 2018.
[4] F. Frieyadie and S. M. Ramadhan, “Penerapan Metode AHP Untuk Membantu Siswa Memilih Jurusan Yang Tepat Di SMK,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 662–667, 2018.
[5] E. Rosiska, “Penerapan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Menentukan Mitra Usaha Berprestasi,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 479–485, 2018.
[6] A. Ramadiani, ramadiani ; Rahmah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Tenaga Kesehatan Teladan,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2019.
[7] N. Hadinata, “Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Penerima Kredit,” vol. 07, no. September, pp. 87–92, 2018.
[8] T. Imandasari and A. P. Windarto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Merekomendasikan Unit Terbaik di PDAM Tirta Lihou Menggunakan Metode Promethee,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 5, no. 4, p. 159, 2017.
[9] S. R. Cholil, A. P. R. Pinem, and V. Vydia, “Implementasi metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique untuk penentuan prioritas rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi pascabencana alam,” Regist. J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2018.
[10] U. Arumi, Endah Ratna; Yudhatama, “Pemanfaatan Curiculum Vitae dan Sasaran Kinerja Pegawai untuk Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan AHP,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2017.
[11] M. Gemain, “Bagaimana Memilih UKM- UKM untuk Berpartisipasi di dalam Pameran-Pameran Perdagangan Kanada,” no. November, 2016.
[12] S. Fajarika, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Balita Sehat Se-Kecamatan Sei Lepan Menggunakan Metode Multi Atributte Utility Theory (Maut) (Studi Kasus: Puskesmas Desa Lama),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 515–521, 2019.
[13] P. Kailiponi, “Analyzing evacuation decisions using multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT),” Procedia Eng., vol. 3, pp. 163–174, 2010.
[14] M. Hidayat and P. A. Jusia, “Analisa dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penerimaan Karyawan PT . Dos Ni Roha Jambi Menggunakan Metode MAUT ( Multi Attribute Utility Theory ),” vol. 13, no. 1, 2018.
[15] J. Nasution and M. Syahrizal, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Calon Kepala Puskesmas Mengunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (Maut) (Studi Kasus: Puskesmas Desa Lama Sei Lepan),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 176–182, 2019.